Journal Articles
- Malek, M.A. (2022). Criminal courts’ artificial intelligence: the way it reinforces, bias and discrimination. AI & Ethics (Springer Nature), 233–245 (2022).
Embracive, pervasive, and unstoppable global algorithmization greatly influences the deployment of artificial intelligence systems in criminal courts to replace obsolete bail and sentencing practices, reduce recidivism risk, and modernize judicial practices. Since artificial intelligence systems have provably appeared to have the duality of golden promises and potential perils, applying such a system in the justice system also entails some associated risks. Hence, allocating this unchecked novel resource in judicial domains sparks vigorous debate over its legal and ethical implications. With such backgrounds, this paper examines how and why artificial intelligence systems reinforce bias and discrimination in society and suggests what approach could be an alternative to the current predictive justice mechanisms in use.
For more, Click here
- Vice and Virtue of the Basic Structure Doctrine: A Comparative Analytic Reconsideration of the Indian Subcontinent’s Constitutional Practices, Commonwealth Law Bulletin (Routledge), 43(1), 48–74 (2017).
This paper examines the doctrine of Basic Structure and its effect on developing constitutional jurisprudence in the Indian sub-continent, i.e. Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan. It also analyses the courts' robust underpinning on the doctrine that puts 'an embargo or a limit upon the parliamentary supremacy'. Such an embargo or a limit is seen as a fundamental one that eventually leads to practical application. Since this position provokes huge controversy, e.g. illegitimacy, anti-democracy, judiciocracy, counter-majoritarianism, anathema to popular sovereignty, non-textual and abstract formulation, etc., it fairly requires doctrinal expositions to be made on how to figure it out. Moreover, it explores the scope, standing, and inviolability of the doctrine in the sense of comparative conceptualization. Furthermore, dissection from the multifarious perspective is made to look into its pragmatism, justification, and legitimacy through fixing today's position in the ongoing debate among contemporary constitutional commentators.
For more, Click here
- Bigger is always not better, less is more, sometimes: the concept of data minimization in the context of Big Data. European Journal of Privacy Law & Technologies, 2021(1).
For more, Click here
- Transparency in Predictive Algorithms: A Judicial Perspective. Advance (Sage Preprint). https://doi.org/10.31124/advance.14699937.
For more, Click here
- Rights of the Elderly: an Emerging Human Rights Discourse, International Journal of Law and Management (Emerald), 59(2), 284–302 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlma-03-2016-0036
- Algorithms assistive decision-making in the criminal courts of the USA: examining procedural legitimacy. Academia Letters, Article 2146 (2022). https://doi.org/10.20935/AL2146
...................................................................................................................................................................
Journal Articles
- Quantification in Criminal Courts: Codified Justice or Algorithmic Unfairness? Towards Data Science (2021).
- Imports of the Data Minimization Principle in the Big Data World. Towards Data Science (2020)
- Factors Behind the ChatGPT Hype: What’s the Next Thing to Do? Medium (2023).
- Diving into the Metaverse: Fiction, Film, and (F)law, TechLaw Dialogue (2023).